No-fault compensation in New Zealand: harmonizing injury compensation, provider accountability, and patient safety.

نویسندگان

  • Marie Bismark
  • Ron Paterson
چکیده

In 1974 New Zealand jettisoned a tort-based system for compensating medical injuries in favor of a government-funded compensation system. Although the system retained some residual fault elements, it essentially barred medical malpractice litigation. Reforms in 2005 expanded eligibility for compensation to all "treatment injuries," creating a true no-fault compensation system. Compared with a medical malpractice system, the New Zealand system offers more-timely compensation to a greater number of injured patients and more-effective processes for complaint resolution and provider accountability. The unfinished business lies in realizing its full potential for improving patient safety.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

New Zealand's 2005 'no-fault' compensation reforms and medical professional accountability for harm.

AIMS To discover the effect of the 2005 'no-fault' compensation reforms on medical professional accountability for harm in the context of overall trends in New Zealand's medical professional accountability processes 2001-2010. METHODS Data for the 5 years before and after the 2005 reforms were compared including compensation claims to the Accident Compensation Corporation (ACC), ACC reporting...

متن کامل

Medical error and its proceeding in French law

In French law, medical error proceeding has undergone many developments, and at present in this country a comprehensive medical compensation system is designed to address both patient rights and physician concerns about the costs of compensation. Contrary to traditional French law and the general classification of medical services in a public or private hospital, a new legal regime has been ado...

متن کامل

Accountability sought by patients following adverse events from medical care: the New Zealand experience.

BACKGROUND Unlike Canada's medical malpractice system, patients in New Zealand who are dissatisfied with the quality of their care may choose between 2 well-established medicolegal paths: one leads to monetary compensation and the other to nonmonetary forms of accountability. We compared the forms of accountability sought by patients and families in New Zealand who took different types of legal...

متن کامل

Legal aspects of contraceptive implants.

©FSRH J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care 2010: 36(4) Introduction Litigation can be seen as a reflection of medical error and harm to patients. Studying litigation may reveal trends from which lessons can be learned, leading to improvements in patient safety.1 The threat of litigation may be of some value in increasing investment in safety.2 An alternative to costly litigation is a no-fault compens...

متن کامل

Acknowledgement of "no fault" medical injury: review of patients' hospital records in New Zealand.

Investigations of the epidemiology of adverse events have advanced the safety of patients in hospital. These studies, however, were done in tort jurisdictions, where the fear of litigation may have inhibited frank and open discussion. New Zealand abolished tort liability in 1972, instead providing an administrative system of compensation without the need to prove fault. We analysed data on adve...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Health affairs

دوره 25 1  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2006